Published
October 1, 2003
Copyright Notice
Copyright and Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
1. Copyright
Authors retain copyright of content they publish in Historical Studies in Education / Revue d’histoire de l’éducation and grant the journal the right of first publication.
2. Open Access License
All content published in Historical Studies in Education / Revue d’histoire de l’éducation is made freely available online immediately upon publication under an open license, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0).
The full terms of the license are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
3. No Additional Restrictions
Published content is immediately, permanently, and freely available in full text online. There are no delayed open access restrictions or timed embargoes on content. The journal does not apply technical protection measures, moving walls, or paywalls.
There are no subscriptions. No subscription fees are charged to readers.
No fees are charged to authors. (There are no article processing charges, or APCs.)
4. Directory of Open Access Journals
Historical Studies in Education / Revue d’histoire de l’éducation is indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
Historical Studies in Education / Revue d’histoire de l’éducation
v. 3 September 2026
Licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abstract
The quarter of a century between 1972 and 1996 witnessed
the end of the Imperial Age of school administration in British
Columbia. The historical pattern of strong central control which
had directed the course of provincial schooling for a century
was beginning to unravel even before the 1960s were over,
prompted in part by a malaise inside educational government and
by new forces in and outside schools. Although provincial
authorities entered the 1970s still confident in their capacity
to control and direct public education, the Ministry of
Education found itself before the decade ended, like Napoleon’s
army retreating from Moscow, bewildered by an unfamiliar
landscape and harried on all sides by adversaries who seemed to
materialize from nowhere, each with its own special brief for
provincial schools. By the 1980s, the province’s education
bureaucracy, once the dominant and solitary voice in school
affairs, was obliged to compete on the public policy stage with
a chorus of others eager to contest the province’s right to
speak on behalf of children. By the mid-1990s, the rising power
of the teachers’ Federation, increasing parental and public
demands for participation in educational decisions, and the
Ministry of Education’s ambiguity about its own purpose had all
served, in various ways, to reduce the province’s leadership in
public education.